Sex cam chips love mail rumyalenkoedating
For new digital cameras, a bigger sensor area captures better quality, but requires larger diameter, bulkier lenses.To optimize the size of a serious travel camera, consider 1-inch-Type sensor or up to APS-C sensor size.But for a given year of technological advance, tiny-sensor cameras can have severe limitations compared to physically larger cameras in terms of print enlargement, autofocus speed, blurred performance in dim or indoor light, and so forth.The “best” travel camera is the one that you are willing to carry.I expect that RX10’s catch-up in quality under dim light is due to superior light sensitivity of BSI sensor plus larger lens diameter gathering more light, 72mm versus 55mm.In principle, you might expect a slightly sharper image on an APS-C sensor when using the sweet spot of a lens designed for a full frame (which has a larger imaging circle), but results actually vary, especially when using older film-optimized lenses.
Historically, evocative images can clearly be captured regardless of camera size or modernity.Its larger lens diameter gathering more light also helps in this comparison (72mm filter size of RX10 III versus 67mm SEL18200 on A6300).In my field tests, the linear sharpness of Sony’s high-quality SEL1670Z 3x zoom f/4 lens on flagship A6300 is only about 5% better than Sony RX10 III f/2.4-4 in bright light in the wider half of its 24-105mm equivalent range, but no better in dim light.In my side-by-side field tests, the sharp, bright 25x zoom of Sony RX10 III resoundingly beats the resolution of 11x SEL18200 lens on flagship APS-C Sony A6300 at 90 mm equivalent telephoto, even as high as ISO 6400.(Wider angle zoom settings show little quality difference.) Apparently RX10’s faster f/2.4-4 lens plus (BSI) technology magically compensate for the sensor size difference, 1″-Type versus APS-C.